Skip to main content

Brazil Senate votes to remove president Dilma Rousseff


Brazil's suspended President Dilma RousseffBRASILIA, Brazil -- Senators debated the fate of Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff into the wee hours of Wednesday ahead of a planned vote later in the day on whether to remove Rousseff permanently as leader of Latin America's most populous country.
Many of the 81 senators signed up to speak Tuesday afternoon on the fifth day of her impeachment trial and the session finally adjourned around 2:30 a.m. (1:30 a.m. EDT/0530 GMT). Chief Justice Ricardo Lewandowski, presiding over the trial, said it would resume late Wednesday morning for the final vote on removing her.
Passionate closing arguments by Rousseff's accusers and speeches by her allies appeared to do little to tip the balance in her favour on the eve of the impeachment decision. Suspended by the Senate in May, Rousseff faces permanent removal for allegedly breaking fiscal responsibility laws in managing the federal budget.
Most of the senators making statements attacked Rousseff, blaming her for Brazil falling into its deepest recession in decades and saying she ignored signs of a slowdown.
Janaina Paschoal, the lawyer leading the case against Brazil's first female president, said that Brazil's first female president had committed fraud when breaking fiscal laws.
"We are not dealing with a little accounting problem," she said. "The fraud was documented."
Paschoal then broke into tears as she asked for Rousseff's forgiveness for making the president suffer.
Rousseff's defence attorney, Jose Eduardo Cardozo, also got emotional after closing his case and called Paschoal's teary comments "insulting."
The presentations came in the final phase of a political fight that has polarized Brazil since the impeachment measure was introduced in the lower Chamber of Deputies late last year.
For Rousseff to be removed, at least 54 of the 81 senators must vote in favour. Local media have reported that at least 52 senators have said they will vote for ouster, while roughly 18 are opposed and 11 have not said. In May, the same body voted 55-22 to impeach and suspend her.
Allies of Rousseff have signalled that if she is removed from office, they will take the case to the Supreme Court. But several motions filed to the country's highest court throughout the impeachment proceedings have failed.
Rousseff, a former guerrilla fighter who was tortured and imprisoned during the country's dictatorship, says she broke no laws and notes that previous presidents used similar accounting measures.
On Monday, she argued before senators that she was forced to make tough choices on the budget in the face of declining revenues and a refusal by opponents in Congress to work with her.
"I know I will be judged, but my conscience is clear. I did not commit a crime," Rousseff told senators in a 30-minute address.
Rousseff had sharp words for her vice-president, Michel Temer, who took over when she was temporarily suspended and will finish her term through 2018 if the Senate permanently removes her.
She called him a "usurper" who in May named a Cabinet of all white men in a country that is more than 50 per cent non-white. Temer's Cabinet has been roundly criticized for its lack of diversity, with three ministers were forced to step down within a month of taking office because of corruption allegations.
Rousseff asserted that impeachment was the price she paid for refusing to quash a wide-ranging police investigation into the state oil company Petrobras, saying that corrupt lawmakers conspired to oust her to derail the investigation into billions in kickbacks at the oil giant.
Rousseff said it was "an irony of history" she would be judged for crimes she did not commit, by people accused of serious crimes.

Popular posts from this blog

Photos from Delta state's cultural parade

Delta state is celebrating its 25 years of existence and as part of activities for the celebration, the state government today organized a cultural parade which took place at the Cenotaph, Asaba. See More photos below.

Again, why TINUBU must rescue Nigerians from BUHARI, Africa's new Niccolo Machiavelli

There is no denying the fact that bad economic and foreign policies can precipitate serious crises like such we experience today in Nigeria capable of sparking off dangerous political consequences thus making politicians demand arbitrary power to deal with emergency situations caused by bad government policies. When times are bad many people have no option but are often too willing to go along and support terrible things that would be unthinkable in good times. In Nigeria, for instance, we have had dictators in military garbs and it took us years of dogged fighting, dingdong struggles, and battles to return the country from military dictatorship to constitutional democracy like such Nigerians enjoyed in the past one and half decades ago. Prior to the freedom that held sway in the past 16 years of Nigeria's civil democratic rule, Nigerians languished under the jackboot of the military that saw the emergence of many pro-democracy groups, the most vibrant of all being the...

Are we supposed to be afraid of God?

JimsBlog Posts from the Pastor of Richmond's First Baptist Chu Skip to content BY  JIM SOMERVILL    Sunday’s sermon touched on some questions I’ve been getting in “Talkback,” my weekly question-and-answer sessions with First Baptist Church’s adult Sunday school classes.  This excerpt deals with one of those questions. Sometimes, in my Talkback sessions, someone will ask about that biblical expression, “the fear of the Lord.”  “Are we supposed to be afraid of God?” they ask.  No.  That’s not what the word  fear  means, not in that context.  It means something more like “awe,” or “reverence,” or “profound respect.”  But you can see where the word came from, can’t you?  From an experience like this one at Mount Sinai (Exodus 19): where Moses went up to receive the Ten Commandments and the people trembled in fear before the mountain of the Lord.  And when the writer of Proverbs said, “The fear of the Lord i...